This website uses cookies
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic.
We do not share your personal information. We do share data regarding your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you've provided to them or that they've collected from your use of their services.
Nearly $7 million that supports nursing education and research in Missouri is at risk under federal proposals to eliminate key Title VIII workforce programs.
During a House Science Committee hearing before the Congressional recess, Rep. Luz Rivas (D-CA) spoke about caps on indirect costs for federally-funded research programs.
The evidence is now clear that the modern American structure of science can no longer survive as an apolitical entity that enjoys consistent, bipartisan support. Science is now suffering a generational catastrophe, not just in terms of funding, but in terms of political and public support.
It’s been a tough year for science south of the border. Budgets slashed. Scientists fired. Protections erased.
Since 20 January 2025, the Trump administration has decimated science and research across the U.S., and it’s having very real impacts on Canada’s research community.
This decision comes after the Trump administration demanded that the UC pay nearly $1.2 billion in fines and overhaul its policies as a response to claims of antisemitism and civil rights violations by UCLA.
The $1.5 billion in federal funding cuts will shutter testing, outreach and housing programs—while one LA nonprofit has already lost more than half its budget.
Between the end of February and mid-August, funding ceased for 383 studies that were testing treatments for conditions including cancer, heart disease and brain disease. The cuts disproportionately impacted efforts to tackle infectious diseases like the flu, pneumonia and COVID-19, researchers found.
Federal funds helped spur every major advancement in life sciences in the last half century. Private foundations can’t fill the gap if it drops significantly.
Ongoing disruptions in federal funding are causing many young brain scientists to reconsider their career choice, according to leaders of the Society for Neuroscience (SfN), which represents more than 37,000 researchers and clinicians.
Federal research funding to universities has fueled breakthroughs for years. The White House is pressuring universities to align with the president's political agenda, or risk losing their funding.
He said most Americans aren’t aware of how decades of federally funded research have led to today’s lifesaving breakthroughs. To help reconnect people to that, he’s assembling a “storybook” with tales from patients whose lives have been transformed by medicine.
Caring compassionately for all patients, conducting groundbreaking research, and training the next generation of physicians will remain academic medicine’s North Star, even in the face of considerable political headwinds.
As Congress struggles to resolve the ongoing budget standoff, advocates, and lawmakers, are expressing growing concern that key HIV and AIDS programs could face steep reductions.
An analysis evaluating the quantitative role of federally funded cancer clinical trials vs those funded by industry sponsors found that early-phase, multimodality, dose de-escalation, rare cancer, and child-focused drug and biological agent clinical trials were more likely to be conducted by federally sponsored research groups.
Since January, Trump has blitzed US funding for research institutions and universities, and overseen mass layoffs of scientists at federal agencies. His cuts have raised the possibility of the United States losing its position as the world leader in research.
Federal support for scientific inquiry, once considered a pillar of the nation’s innovation and global competitiveness, is facing unprecedented disruption.
Nearly two months after the federal government froze over half a million dollars in research funding to UCLA, the National Institutes of Health has temporarily reinstated their suspended grants Tuesday – abiding by a federal judge’s Monday ruling.
According to the AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025, due to the budget cuts across all federal health agencies—coupled with grant delays, canceled clinical trials, mass layoffs throughout the research workforce, and political interference—the cancer research and clinical care community is “facing its most serious funding crisis in a generation.”
The Trump administration has given notice that political appointees, rather than scientists, will ultimately decide who gets grant money from the world’s largest biomedical research funder — the federal government’s National Institutes of Health.
When Geza Kogler, a former professor at Kennesaw State University, lost his National Institutes of Health grant, he didn’t just lose funding; he lost a program he believed in and, quite possibly, his career in academia.
On Thursday evening, dozens of researchers hosted a science fair at UCLA aimed at showcasing the work that’s been suspended by the Trump administration.